Header Menu
Imaan Ali December 8, 2020 No Comments

Common Causes of Failure Among Process Mining Initiatives, and How to Avoid Them

Executive Summary Process Mining is an extremely useful tool in the practice of modern process automation. It not only helps to ensure processes and data align with company expectations but also can support organizations in maximizing process efficiencies and in helping companies focus on ways to improve customer service. Despite the usefulness and applicability of process mining in most business processes, there are several major pitfalls that can severely handicap how well process mining works if not addressed properly, and the best time to do that is before implementation begins. In this blog we identify and describe five such challenges that new users of process mining need to make sure to avoid. Keep in mind, process mining encompasses a tremendously growing and expanding field of automation techniques, so for customers considering use of process mining for the first time there is an ever-expanding set of features and techniques from which to choose. Of course, the critical consideration is which ones are the most beneficial for your company right now and in the immediate future. With the rate of change in the tool sets, it is unrealistic to factor in projections of the long term when it comes to process mining.  As noted, process mining tools are constantly under development and have ever expanding sets of major features and capabilities, including, most importantly, ever-increasing amounts of AI modelling and projections throughout the entire process mining framework. Because of this, it is critical that companies not be entirely dependent on the professional staff or partner consultants for the selected process mining tool. Company personnel need to be key contributors to the implementation of process mining on all a company’s processes. Companies need to take the significant step necessary to educate internal staff on the selected tool (and on process mining in general), to ensure that the tool succeeds and provides significant benefits to the company. Here are some of the most common challenges companies face in their process mining initiatives. Since process mining tools are constantly being updated and new features and capabilities are being added, these particular challenges may lessen in importance over time and/or be replaced by new challenges due to advances in the tools.  Using Process Mining for a Process that Doesn’t Really Need It While choosing the tool most appropriate for your company is a critical step, it is also important to analyze your own company’s processes thoroughly and take enough time to figure out where process mining can be best used and provide the most benefit. There are several signs in a process that can make it a very good candidate for process mining. These include overly complex data; no clear data structure apparent; unidentifiable problems, deviations and bottlenecks found in the process- just to name a few. By picking a process that is not entirely in need of process mining, a company is essentially wasting its money for no important reason. The way to ensure that a process mining tool will be maximizing company benefits is to make sure to deploy it for a process that checks off the most boxes of being a good candidate. Although using a process mining tool does not automatically correlate to maximizing a company’s profit, picking the most appropriate process to use the tool to start with will definitely increase a company’s chances at success and will greatly increase the internal momentum within the company to continue to expand the processes covered by process mining. The Process Contains Incomplete Data Having incomplete data in a process will be an obvious bump in the road towards achieving full process automation. Since process mining tools are specifically designed to find gaps in the data, using process mining for a process with incomplete data can make some sense in helping process engineers to better understand these gaps. However, it will definitely be easier and more straightforward if these gaps can be filled before the process mining tool is implemented. Depending on which part of a process the data is missing, if there is missing data, the resulting process mining outputs may be significantly degraded as process mining tools produce a fully linked chain of events where each successive event impacts the rest of the actions. If data is missing in one part of a process, that will impede progress in gaining a full understanding of the process using a process mining tool. The Process Has Too Much “Concept Drifting” “Concept Drift” refers to the tendency of processes to change over time, in particular while they are under the ‘analysis microscope’ of the process mining tool. For example, process changes can occur during different seasons; this is an example of how processes can change periodically. The chart below demonstrates the various types of concept drifting that can occur in a process, whatever the underlying reason may be. These drifts can impact the digital structure that process mining comes up with and will make the process mining analysis and results very unstable and difficult to interpret. Splitting a process up into several smaller event logs is often an easy and effective way to discover possible concept drifting. Being aware of and managing concept drift in your process from the beginning before process mining is first implemented will help ensure that it remains controllable and understandable as process mining procedures are implemented, and prevent ‘drifts’ from having negative impacts on process mining analysis and results. Data is Not in an Appropriate Format Pre-processing and data preparation are vital steps to a successful process mining initiative and unfortunately this step is often overlooked. It is crucial to look at the import format of your data to ensure that it agrees with the process mining tool you have selected. If there is a mismatch in format, the data will likely not be processed fully or even at all. In these cases, analyses from the process mining tools will be of poor quality, showing results with missing spots or even a completely blank event log. Clearly this needs

Imaan Ali December 3, 2020 No Comments

Document Understanding: A Short Guide on the Major Process Steps

1.   Executive Summary Document Understanding (DU) is one of the fastest-growing areas in business process automation. The DU ecosystem includes technologies that can interpret and extract text and meaning from a wide range of document types including structured, semi-structured and unstructured — even ones that contain handwriting, tables and checkboxes. This is now possible because of the ever-improving techniques of Machine Learning (ML).  Enhancements in ML are spurring innovation in document understanding. In this article, we present the major steps in the DU process and the underlying architecture with reference specifically to UiPath’s Document Understanding framework. Multiple technologies can unlock the power of document understanding such as: In today’s business processes, most of the routine and mundane tasks employees perform consist of creating, reading, reviewing, and transcribing paperwork (documents). Employees spend a significant percentage of their work time reading these docs, extracting data, and passing on the much-needed information into other downstream applications manually. Since the data extraction from the documents and input to other apps is done by a human, the process is subject to problems of accuracy and reliability. UiPath’s Document Understanding solution allows you to intelligently process data with a high level of accuracy and reliability for any type of document such as invoice, receipt, financial statement, utility bill, and any other kind of text that has a different structure. The general flow for UiPath’s DU process is encapsulated into the 6 process steps below. To decide which steps are needed for a specific business process, you will need to address the below requirements: One primary concern of the solution is that it should not stop the entire process until a human performs a manual verification. The process should escalate the check to the respective party, while at the same time continuing to evaluate and process the rest of the documents. 2.   Classification Based Approach There are scenarios where data extraction is not essential, and the priority is only to segregate the documents based only on classification, for further processing later in another process. In such cases, the UiPath DU solution comes in very handy as it provides the capability to classify documents based on keywords. The solution offers the ability to train the classifiers intelligently when setting up the automation solution. These classifiers will also continue to learn every time a document is classified (and verified by a human) thus improving accuracy over time. The classification and verification process steps are suitable for attended automation. The attended automation provides a Classification Station, where a user can verify and correct the classification if the confidence is below a predefined value. A schematic of the process is shown in the below chart. Classification Process In most business scenarios, classification is not the only requirement. Most processes will also require the extraction of data from the documents and processing of the extracted data according to specified business requirements. However, even in this case, we cannot ignore the classification process step in the automated approach, as it is essential to identify the type of document so that the robot knows how and what fields to extract. Different methods are available to handle manual verification of classification results: Use attended and unattended collaboration in scenarios where the process should be manually triggered. If the same user who triggered the process is doing the validation, the use of a Validation Station is possible. However, based on the business logic, if certain exceptional cases need management approval, such escalations can be directed to the Action Centre directly without showing to the user at the Validation Station. When designing a Document Understanding solution, it is a good practice to break the solution into separate manageable sub-processes. As a generic solution that fits for most cases, we could introduce three sub-processes to handle the Document Understanding Framework. This high-level diagram showcases a sample architecture for the Document Understanding process. The architecture used here breaks the entire document understanding process into three main sub-processes. The three main components are Initiator process along with processing logic (Process 1), UiPath Action Centre for task assignment and management (Process 2), and finally, the Train models component (Process 3) which handles the training of the intelligent classifiers and also the passing of the extracted data to other applications. The detailed architecture of each part is as follows. Process-1: The initiator Process The Initiator process is the primary process that handles document classification, data extraction, and verification logic. The verification logic will include the rules that define how to handle verifications automatically, either through the use of the Validation Station, Action Centre, or both when human intervention is needed. Depending on the option chosen in the validation logic, the extracted data will finally be passed to either the Action Centre Processor or to Post Processing to continue to the next steps. The diagram below shows a sample architecture for the Initiator Process. Process 1: Initiator Process Process 2: Action Center The Action Centre is the process that handles task creation, waits for task completion, and finally passes the data to the Post Processing portion for the end of Document Understanding. The diagram below shows a sample architecture for the Action Center process. Process 2: Action Center Process Architecture Process 3: Post Processing The post-processing includes the steps needed for exporting the final verified data, training the models, and finally, passing the data to a different process outside the document understanding framework to continue with any system interactions, etc. The data is handed over to a separate process because such steps are not part of document understanding and those should be maintained independently to maintain integrity and reusability of each component/ process. The diagram below shows a sample architecture design for the final stage of the document understanding framework, and it also showcases how Process 2 connects with Process 3. Process 3: Post Processing Solution Architecture Conclusion Although the specifics of the business process may change from one company to another, the core architecture and process steps showcased above remain largely the same

Imaan Ali November 24, 2020 No Comments

Is Your Business In Need of Process Mining?

5 Signs that Your Business Process is too Complicated and In Need of Process Mining As more automation opportunities arise, it is becoming increasingly imperative for businesses to use process mining to examine their business processes closely and determine those most ready to yield significant benefits from automation (and not solely focus on the latest technology stack!). Getting a more complete view of reality of a company’s processes and understand precisely what is happening there in real time and at the individual unit of output, these things can enable a company to move closer and much quicker to the goal of maximizing ROI through automation. Process mining has always been a mainstay of process automation, but the surprising part – it is often overlooked or not given the priority it deserves by clients in their rush to RPA and Intelligent Automation. The underlying assumption is that processes in the company are running in the manner BPM has mapped them out, without exceptions. But in reality that is often not so, there are many alternatives and exceptional paths that business in a company gets executed, and it is the goal of process mining to find them all out and present them to the company’s process engineers for inspection and further corrective action. The good part, process mining is a leading business process management technique that can be used relatively easily and quickly by an organization without any disruption to the underlying business processes. And the even better part, it can be used by companies of all sizes, it is not exclusively a large company technology. Once implemented it allows for ease in process automation and provides much better results than any manual mining operation. The purpose of this short blog is to lay out the 5 most important factors that indicate your company really needs to look into process mining as the way to better understand your business processes. If your response to any one or two of these 5 key process characteristics is in the negative, our recommendation is your look into process mining.  In our view, it is very likely your business process will benefit big time from process mining, most companies we are aware of do!  It provides real-time, actual, quantitative guideposts of your processes – that is in itself is a big advantage as all companies are heading to complete digital transformation. Moreover, it will allow you to analyze which specific processes are most in need of automation, and if using process mining can improve the company’s processes substantially and the order with which to begin! Here are some critical signs to look for in a process that suggest your process likely will be in need of process mining, and the benefits it provides: 1. Significant Data Analysis in Your Process By combining Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with Process Mining, businesses are now able to configure massive amounts of data and highlight the most valuable data and trends in order to make it readable to employees. So, keep in mind, process mining not only helps to identify and eliminate inefficiencies but it also streamlines process data collection. If you are getting overloaded with process data streams, and you’re able to only look at a few, process mining can help a great deal in this regard. Below is a data sample from SAP Process Mining by Celonis. Not only does their process mining tool streamline the data but also enables the company to customize their own categories for data sorting. 2. Not Truly Understanding your Process Not having a full understanding of business processes, and all the ways business things actually get done, can a big problem especially in the face of imperatives such as 100% process automation and digital transformation. This lack of process knowledge can come from many different factors: in some cases, processes are just too complex to follow so employees generalize them and hope for the best. Over time, this can lead to discrepancies in how each worker understands the processes and how they actually work, since essentially no one is fully aware of the process as a whole, rather everyone only knows it from their specific view of the surface. If it is hard to follow what is actually being going on in your processes, and in particular you can’t get a hold of all the exceptional process paths that works get done on, that is a surefire sign that process mining is likely needed and will be of great help. Take a look at the Purchase-Order example below and you will see how crazy and complex processes can be. More often than not, business processes tend to be just as detailed as the one below, if not more. Without a process mining tool, businesses can never truly wrap their head around the ins and outs of their process, causing them to miss the small deviations that go on to cause greater issues later on.          3. Complex HR work      The HR department tends to contain a plethora of repetitive tasks that can frustrate humans. All the manual labor that goes into inputting information into spreadsheets and logs is not only inefficient but is not making the best use of the people in HR whose jobs pertain to communication with others. Process mining (especially the element of it called task mining) can allow for these employees to be doing the work they were meant to do while their tedious processes become essentially autonomous. 4. Unidentifiable Problems or Gaps in Your End-to-end Process If businesses do not have a clear picture of their processes end-to-end as they actually exists, they will find it difficult even to notice or pinpoint any serious issues, let alone find solutions for them. Not understanding the process end-to-end can mean that there are gaps needing to be understood and filled in. Within these gaps are where the most bottlenecks are likely to arise since there is a lack of accountability for what the process flow is. Process Mining